20 & 40 Hilton Court Slide Repair

Status Planning County
Project Type Repair/Maintenance Location Not Mapped
Project Area (Acres) No Data

Project Identification

IDType
1600-2008-0378-3 CDFW - Record Number
1600-2008-0283-3 CDFW - Record Number
02-07-C0849 SWRCB - 401 Certification Letter (e.g., Site Number or WDID)
724817 SWRCB - CIWQS Place Number
2008-00247S USACE - File Number

Habitat Plan

ActivityHabitatSubHabitatAcresActivity StatusWater Regime
Enhancement Riverine Wetland Riparian area No Data Construction planned

Related Habitat Impacts

HabitatAcres Lost
Riverine Wetland Not Recorded

Sites

NameStatusAcres
20 & 40 Hilton Court Slide Repair Construction planned No Data

Events

DateTypeDescriptionSite Name
2013-10-01 Monitoring end Estimated date
2009-10-16 Update Project type updated
2009-09-29 Groundwork start Estimated date
2009-07-01 Project entered Project entered into database
2009-01-26 Project submitted Project submitted
2008-10-31 Monitoring start Estimated date
2008-10-31 Groundwork end Estimated date
2008-08-25 Permit RWQCB permit issued
2008-08-18 Permit CDFG permit issued
2008-07-10 Permit USACE permit issued

People

TypeNameOrganizationDepartment
Contact Tiffany Fong Unknown/Unspecified Not applicable/Unknown
Contact John Prowznik Unknown/Unspecified Not applicable/Unknown
Contact Victoria Prowznik Unknown/Unspecified Not applicable/Unknown
Contact Bruce Fong Unknown/Unspecified Not applicable/Unknown

Funding

ActivityFunderAmount
No Data

Related CRAM Assessments

Visit DateVersionSite NameWetland TypeIndex Score
No Data

Performance Criteria

StatusDetailsEvaluation Date
Original criteria At the end of five years, 25 willow trees will survive. 2009-01-26

Project Description

Description
The purpose of this project is to repair and stabilize the existing Las Trampas Creek bank in order to prevent the failure of the bank that threatens two homes. The project consists of the installation of vegetated loose rock riprap and a vegetated and precast concrete block wall (Loffelstein wall or equivalent) to prevent further erosion to the existing stream bank and protect two homes located adjacent to the creek.
Upload files or links
Name File Type Submitted On Submitted By
20& 40 Hilton Court Slide Repair Wetland Tracker Form Other 2009-08-10 Alison Fong, San Francisco Estuary Institute
corrected 3.2.09 wetland_tracker_ 20-40 Hilton Ct.doc

Vicinity Map of 20 & 40 Hilton Court Photo 2009-08-10 Alison Fong, San Francisco Estuary Institute
Figure 1 - Vicinity Map.doc

How to Use the Habitat Development Curve

Habitat Development Curves (HDCs) are used to determine the developmental status and trajectory of on-the-ground projects to create, restore, or enhance California wetland and stream habitats. Each HDC is based on assessments of habitat condition for different age areas of one habitat type that in aggregate represent the full spectrum of habitat development. The assessments of condition are provided by expert applications of the California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM). Visit the CRAM website for more information about CRAM.

For each HDC, reference condition is represented by areas of a habitat that consistently get very high CRAM scores, have not been subject to disruptive management practices, and exist within landscapes that are protected and managed for their natural conditions. The horizontal lines intersecting the top of an HDC represent the mean CRAM score and standard deviation of scores for 25 qualifying reference areas.

The age of a project is estimated as the elapsed time in years between the groundwork end date for the project and the date of the CRAM assessment. To add or update a groundwork end date, use the Project Events form in Project Tracker (ptrack.ecoatlas.org). The minimum age in years of a non-project area, including any natural reference area, is estimated from all available local information, including historical maps and imagery, historical written accounts, and place-specific scientific studies of habitat development.

An HDC can be used to address the following questions:

  1. At what time in the future will the area of assessed habitat achieve the reference condition or other milestones in habitat development? The HDC can answer this question if the CRAM score for the assessed area is within the confidence interval of the HDC. The answer is the time in years along the HDC between the current age of the assessed area and the future date corresponding to the intersection of the HDC and the reference condition or other milestone.
  2. Is the area of assessed habitat likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace as most other areas of the same habitat type? The habitat area is likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace if the CRAM score for the area is above, below, or within the confidence interval of the HDC, respectively.
  3. What can be done to improve the condition of the habitat area or to increase its rate of development? HDCs by themselves cannot answer this question. Possible answers can be inferred by the following analysis that involves HDCs:
    1. Examine the HDC for each of the four CRAM Attributes;
    2. Identify the Attribute(s) scoring below the HDC;
    3. For any low-scoring Attribute, examine the component Metric Scores (note: the Metric Scores for any public CRAM assessment in the CRAM database can be obtained through EcoAtlas);
    4. Assume the low score of an Attribute is due to its low-scoring Metric(s);
    5. Consider modifying the design or management of the habitat area in ways that will sustainably increase its score(s) for the low-scoring Metric(s).

For more information about CRAM Attributes and Metrics, including their scientific rationale, see the CRAM Manual.

Display Habitat Development Curves For Wetland Type:

CRAM Site Scores