Queseria Creek Fish Passage Improvement

Status Completed County Santa Cruz
Project Type Repair/Maintenance Location 37.04354° N, -122.22273° W Map
Project Area (Acres) 5.50

Project Identification

IDType
706403 CDFW - Fisheries Restoration Grant

Habitat Plan

ActivityHabitatSubHabitatAcresActivity StatusWater Regime
Enhancement Riverine Wetland Riparian area 5.50 Construction completed

Related Habitat Impacts

HabitatAcres Lost
No Data

Sites

NameStatusAcres
Queseria Creek Construction completed 5.50

Events

DateTypeDescriptionSite Name
2011-01-01 Monitoring end Estimated date Queseria Creek
2009-10-01 Project entered Project entered into database
2008-12-31 Groundwork end Estimated date Queseria Creek
2006-01-01 Groundwork start Estimated date Queseria Creek
2006-01-01 Monitoring start Estimated date Queseria Creek

People

TypeNameOrganizationDepartment
Contact Brian Dietterick California Polytechnic State University Not applicable/Unknown

Funding

ActivityFunderAmount
Enhancement CDFW Prop 1 - Delta Water Quality and Ecosystem Restoration Grant Program

Related CRAM Assessments

Visit DateVersionSite NameWetland TypeIndex Score
2010-07-28 5.0.2 Queseria Creek Middle Section riverine non-confined 68
2010-07-28 5.0.2 Queseria Creek Lower riverine non-confined 56
2010-07-28 5.0.2 Queseria Creek Upper Reach riverine non-confined 73
2007-12-12 5.0.1 Queseria riverine non-confined 59
2005-08-05 3.55 Queseria Creek riverine confined 68

Performance Criteria

StatusDetailsEvaluation Date
No Data

Project Description

Description
Improve passage conditions in Queseria Creek for adult and juvenile steelhead trout and coho salmon by removing an undersized and misaligned pipe culvert, re-aligning 100 feet of stream channel, and installing a bottomless, multi-plate arch on pre-cast concrete.
Upload files or links
Name File Type Submitted On Submitted By
Final Report Monitoring Report 2011-04-28 Sarah Stoner-Duncan, Central Coast Wetlands Group
Final Report wtih acknowledgements.pdf

Santa Cruz Countywide Partners in Restoration Permit Coordination Program, 2007 Annual Report

Management Plan Plan Or Permit 2011-04-12 Sarah Stoner-Duncan, Central Coast Wetland Group
Queseria Management Plan Update 2009.pdf

Plant Directory Other 2011-04-12 Sarah Stoner-Duncan, Central Coast Wetland Group
QUESERIA_CREEK_PLANT_DIRECTORY_V.3.pdf

QC-Non-nativeProfiles.pdf

How to Use the Habitat Development Curve

Habitat Development Curves (HDCs) are used to determine the developmental status and trajectory of on-the-ground projects to create, restore, or enhance California wetland and stream habitats. Each HDC is based on assessments of habitat condition for different age areas of one habitat type that in aggregate represent the full spectrum of habitat development. The assessments of condition are provided by expert applications of the California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM). Visit the CRAM website for more information about CRAM.

For each HDC, reference condition is represented by areas of a habitat that consistently get very high CRAM scores, have not been subject to disruptive management practices, and exist within landscapes that are protected and managed for their natural conditions. The horizontal lines intersecting the top of an HDC represent the mean CRAM score and standard deviation of scores for 25 qualifying reference areas.

The age of a project is estimated as the elapsed time in years between the groundwork end date for the project and the date of the CRAM assessment. To add or update a groundwork end date, use the Project Events form in Project Tracker (ptrack.ecoatlas.org). The minimum age in years of a non-project area, including any natural reference area, is estimated from all available local information, including historical maps and imagery, historical written accounts, and place-specific scientific studies of habitat development.

An HDC can be used to address the following questions:

  1. At what time in the future will the area of assessed habitat achieve the reference condition or other milestones in habitat development? The HDC can answer this question if the CRAM score for the assessed area is within the confidence interval of the HDC. The answer is the time in years along the HDC between the current age of the assessed area and the future date corresponding to the intersection of the HDC and the reference condition or other milestone.
  2. Is the area of assessed habitat likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace as most other areas of the same habitat type? The habitat area is likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace if the CRAM score for the area is above, below, or within the confidence interval of the HDC, respectively.
  3. What can be done to improve the condition of the habitat area or to increase its rate of development? HDCs by themselves cannot answer this question. Possible answers can be inferred by the following analysis that involves HDCs:
    1. Examine the HDC for each of the four CRAM Attributes;
    2. Identify the Attribute(s) scoring below the HDC;
    3. For any low-scoring Attribute, examine the component Metric Scores (note: the Metric Scores for any public CRAM assessment in the CRAM database can be obtained through EcoAtlas);
    4. Assume the low score of an Attribute is due to its low-scoring Metric(s);
    5. Consider modifying the design or management of the habitat area in ways that will sustainably increase its score(s) for the low-scoring Metric(s).

For more information about CRAM Attributes and Metrics, including their scientific rationale, see the CRAM Manual.

Display Habitat Development Curves For Wetland Type:

CRAM Site Scores