Lower Marsh and Sand Creek Watershed Planning Project

Status Planning County Contra Costa
Project Type Non-mitigation Location 37.94816° N, -121.70783° W Map
Project Area (Acres) No Data Last Updated 17 July 2017

Project Identification

IDType
Prop1-Y1-2015-019 SSJDC - Prop 1 Grant ID

Habitat Plan

ActivityHabitatSubHabitatAcresActivity StatusWater Regime
No Data

Related Habitat Impacts

HabitatAcres LostType of Loss
No Data

Sites

NameStatusAcres
No Data

Events

DateTypeDescriptionSite Name
No Data

People

TypeNameOrganizationDepartment
Contact John Cain American Rivers Not applicable/Unknown

Funding

ActivityFunderAmount
No Data

Related CRAM Assessments

Visit DateVersionSite NameWetland TypeIndex Score
2015-09-17 6.1 Marsh Creek riverine non-confined 53
2015-05-28 6.1 Marsh Creek riverine confined 68

Performance Criteria

StatusDetailsEvaluation Date
No Data

Project Description

Description
The purpose of this project is to create a Programmatic CEQA document for future restoration activities conducted by Grantee and their partners (the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District), and the City of Brentwood) in the Marsh Creek and Sand Creek watersheds. A programmatic CEQA will provide a comprehensive, area-wide approach to planning and permitting that will facilitate implementation of habitat restoration projects. The programmatic CEQA document will reduce the amount of time and resources needed to acquire needed permits and will also encourage further participation in restoration projects by developers by establishing in-place CEQA coverage. Projected urbanization of the area will cause significant changes in water flow in the region due to increased stormwater runoff events. This project will also develop a stormwater management plan for the region so that stormwater flows can be incorporated into future creek restoration projects.
Upload files or links

No files found.

How to Use the Habitat Development Curve

Habitat Development Curves (HDCs) are used to determine the developmental status and trajectory of on-the-ground projects to create, restore, or enhance California wetland and stream habitats. Each HDC is based on assessments of habitat condition for different age areas of one habitat type that in aggregate represent the full spectrum of habitat development. The assessments of condition are provided by expert applications of the California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM). Visit the CRAM website for more information about CRAM.

For each HDC, reference condition is represented by areas of a habitat that consistently get very high CRAM scores, have not been subject to disruptive management practices, and exist within landscapes that are protected and managed for their natural conditions. The horizontal lines intersecting the top of an HDC represent the mean CRAM score and standard deviation of scores for 25 qualifying reference areas.

The age of a project is estimated as the elapsed time in years between the groundwork end date for the project and the date of the CRAM assessment. To add or update a groundwork end date, use the Project Events form in Project Tracker (ptrack.ecoatlas.org). The minimum age in years of a non-project area, including any natural reference area, is estimated from all available local information, including historical maps and imagery, historical written accounts, and place-specific scientific studies of habitat development.

An HDC can be used to address the following questions:

  1. At what time in the future will the area of assessed habitat achieve the reference condition or other milestones in habitat development? The HDC can answer this question if the CRAM score for the assessed area is within the confidence interval of the HDC. The answer is the time in years along the HDC between the current age of the assessed area and the future date corresponding to the intersection of the HDC and the reference condition or other milestone.
  2. Is the area of assessed habitat likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace as most other areas of the same habitat type? The habitat area is likely to develop faster, slower, or at the same pace if the CRAM score for the area is above, below, or within the confidence interval of the HDC, respectively.
  3. What can be done to improve the condition of the habitat area or to increase its rate of development? HDCs by themselves cannot answer this question. Possible answers can be inferred by the following analysis that involves HDCs:
    1. Examine the HDC for each of the four CRAM Attributes;
    2. Identify the Attribute(s) scoring below the HDC;
    3. For any low-scoring Attribute, examine the component Metric Scores (note: the Metric Scores for any public CRAM assessment in the CRAM database can be obtained through EcoAtlas);
    4. Assume the low score of an Attribute is due to its low-scoring Metric(s);
    5. Consider modifying the design or management of the habitat area in ways that will sustainably increase its score(s) for the low-scoring Metric(s).

For more information about CRAM Attributes and Metrics, including their scientific rationale, see the CRAM Manual.

Display Habitat Development Curves For Wetland Type:

CRAM Site Scores